Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-04.txt
Review: Joel M. Halpern
Date: 16 november 2004 

 This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational
 RFC, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. There is
 one item that I think needs clarification before publication. 

 Specifically, I found one aspect of this document confusing. In
 discussing the use of well known anycast addresses for the recursive
 DNS server, several things are stated. One is that the Host can be
 pre-configured, possibly by the factory, with the suitable address.
 The other is that multiple servers may have distinct anycast
 addresses. 

Redundancy by multiple RDNSSes is better provided by multiple servers
having different anycast addresses than multiple servers sharing same
anycast address...

I do not follow how the host can be pre-configured with the anycast
address when there different anycast addresses in use. Can this
really be describes as "a well known anycast address"?