Document: draft-ietf-dhc-stateless-dhcpv6-renumbering-01.txt
From: John Loughney
Date: 14 oktober 2004 

This document is ready to go.  

One small nit:

Page 4:

3.1  Site renumbering

   One of the fundamental principles of IPv6 is that sites receive their
   IPv6 address allocations from an ISP using provider assigned (PA)
   address space.  There is currently no provider independent (PI)
   address space in IPv6.  A site wishing to change ISP must thus
   renumber its network.

"A site wishing to change" struck me as odd, as in many cases, some sites
need to change ISP because of mergers or bankruptcies.  I would change the 
sentence to:

	A site changing its ISP must thus renumber its network.

One question, the Security Considerations section says:

8.  Security Considerations

   There are no security considerations in this problem statemement per
   se.  However, whatever mechanism is designed or chosen to address
   this problem should avoid the introduction of new security concerns
   for (stateless) DHCPv6.

Now, I was actually hoping that there would be some text or pointers
discussing the effect of renumber on security. What are the impacts
to security of using DHCPv6 on security?  I am wrong in thinking that
this is what should be captured in Security Considerations text?