Document: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-07
Reviewer: Lucy Lynch
Date: April 1, 2004

* This draft is basically ready for publication, but has
  nits that should be fixed before publication.

working group discussion:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/dhcwg/current/msg03337.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/dhcwg/current/msg03336.html
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/dhcwg/current/msg03335.html

The draft has been updated to reflect issues raised by Thomas Narten
(see msg03337.html) and the changes appear to have WG approval

This draft is very clearly written, and well organized. My only question
has to do with "other  processes and devices" (not a show stooper).
The abstract states that "Other  processes and devices, many that already
send and receive DHCP format packets, sometimes need to access this
information". Much of the draft is focused on "access concentrator"s
(see for example section 5), a list of those other potenial uses might be
helpful. I also notice a number of lower case shoulds & musts in this
section which may actually be 2119 keywords and should be reviewed in that
light.

Review: DHCP Lease Query
<draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-07.txt>

Status of this Memo
-OK
Copyright Notice
-OK
Abstract
-OK
Table of Contents
-OK

5.  Protocol Overview
- are some these of these "shoulds and musts"  "SHOULDS and MUSTS" ???

8.  IANA Considerations
- 7 values assigned, is TBD acceptable language?

9.  Acknowledgments
-OK
10.  References
-OK
10.1.  Normative References
-OK
10.2.  Informative References
-OK
11.  Author's information
-OK
12.  Intellectual Property Statement
-OK
13.  Full Copyright Statement
-OK