Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ero-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 21 May 2007
IETF LC End Date: 28 May 2007
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Comments: only editorial (i.e., to be handled by the RFC editor) comments:

 - 4 page 4 last sentence: either the wording is poor or the sentence
 should finish by "Relay-Reply message".

 - in 4 and 5 page 4, the abbrev "ORO" should be replaced or expanded into
 "Option Request Option" (I suggest to introduce the abbrev in section 4 to
 use it in section 5).

 - I suggest to use either a dash or a space in message names. BTW RFC 3315
 uses "Relay-forward" and "Relay-reply" (a dash and one cap).

 - IMHO (i.e., do it if you'd like or if someone else asks for it) it should
 be fine to add a detailed reference (section 20.3 of RFC 3315) in the first
 sentence of section 5.