Document: draft-ietf-dccp-spec-09.txt
Review: Scott W Brim 
Date: 2 mars 2005 

No objection.

What's to object to?  OK, I admit that as I was going through it, it
felt good to be reading a protocol spec done in rigorous classical
style, and as I got near the end I spent less time on detail, so I
might have missed something.  

One thing I might investigate if I had a couple days to think about it
would be the overall architecture of the protocol, because it has
accumulated a lot of features.  Sometimes when a protocol develops a
lot of options you can make it better by organizing it along a
different dimension.  However, considering the people who have worked
on DCCP I don't believe I would find any new breakthroughs.