Draft: draft-ietf-bmwg-ospfconv-intraarea-07
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Date: March 30, 2004

basically OK to publish, but they need complete
de-nitting first.

No table of contents, no copyright boilerplate. MUST NOT used
without definition. Minor errors in English. Weak Security Considerations 
section. This draft has not been nitted.

It's a perfectly reasonable description of a methodology for testing OSPF
router convergence (as defined in the previous draft). Apart from the
following gripe, and the nits, I think it's useful work and should be 
published.

Gripe:

  "While this draft assumes OSPFv2, which only carries routing informa-
   tion for IPv4 destinations, nothing in this draft precludes it from
   use with OSPFv3, which carries IPv6 destinations."

I really don't think we should be publishing such statements, which make
IPv6 sound like a poor relation. Surely we should be able to say

   This document applies to both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3, and hence to both
   IPv4 and IPv6.