Document:  draft-housley-gigabeam-radio-link-encrypt-00.txt
Reviewer: Robert Sparks [rjsparks@estacado.net]
Review Date:  Monday 6/5/2006 10:06 AM CST
IETF LC Date: 6/12/2006 
IESG Telechat Date:  Thursday, 08 June 2006

SUMMARY: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits  
that should be fixed before publication.

NOTE TO OTHER REVIEWERS:
The draft does not have any "Intellectual Property Statement" 
end- boilerplate. It does have the BCP 76 section 6 paragraph at 
the beginning, and a derivative works limitation clause

This draft is clearly written. The goal appears to be to provide 
a concrete example of the kinds of security problems this type of 
specialized transport link should address and how those problems 
were addressed in this instance. Enough detail appears to be
present to inform discussions around the solution.

The intent does not appear to be to provide a specification for completely independent implementation of this link, or its encryption, but the level 
of detail sometimes seems to go to that depth (example: 2.4 Differential 
Encoding - I'm not sure who this is  useful to other than
an implementor or a field-inspector). That said - those details do  
not overbear the document.

Caveat: I do not have the background to recognize whether the details  
in some of the descriptions are complete or correct.

If my assumptions of the purpose of the document are correct, this is  
publishable after fixing the following nits:

There is a typo that upsets the nits-checker in the front  
boilerplate: it wants "cite them other than as" rather 
than "cite them other than a"

The reference anchor for [CBC] is missing.