Document: draft-housley-cms-fw-wrap-09.txt
Review: Scott W Brim 
Date: 10 december 2004 


None of it is my area of expertise, but it looks okay --> No Objection.

I did not check the ASN.1 for correctness.

If you feel like a discussion point: I've forgotten almost everything
about ASN.1, but I wonder how much using it increases memory
requirements compared to something else, easily standardized but more
compact.

There are a few things that idnits didn't like, and some broken lines,
but nothing that won't be dealt with in the rfc-editor process.