Document: draft-hoschk-smil-media-type-12.txt
Reviewer: Scott W Brim 
Date: 28 augusti 2004 


I recommend a "discuss".  This is out of my area, and mainly I can only
check for self-consistency.  Overall I see no technical problems but a
couple procedural ones, which I would bring up.  If they are considered
acceptable then I believe the draft is ready to go:

- RFC3023 says:

    "Registrations for new XML-based media types under top-level types
    other than "text" SHOULD, in specifying the charset parameter and
    encoding considerations, define them as: "Same as [charset parameter
    / encoding considerations] of application/xml as specified in RFC
    3023."

  but this draft says:

    "charset

     All of the considerations described in RFC3023 also apply to the
     SMIL media type."

  Is that close enough?  It parallels how RFC3023 wants you to treat
  security considerations, but that may not be a good thing.

- Missing newline:

  "To: ietf-types@iana.org Subject: Registration of MIME media type
  application/smil+xml"

- (There are a couple word choices I would change if I were editor, but
  the intent is clear in all cases.)

Scott