Gen-ART Review Assignments for 08 May 2008

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-05-08).



2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RAIThe Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11
draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Jonathan Rosenberg is Proto Shepherd
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (already reviewed for LC)
    
RAIInstant Message Disposition Notification (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 11
draft-ietf-simple-imdn-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -06 for LC)
    
RTGPIM Bootstrap Router MIB (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 11
draft-ietf-pim-bsr-mib-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -04 for LC)
    
RTGLayer 1 VPN Basic Mode (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 11
draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (already reviewed for 3/27)
    
RTGMPLS Upstream Label Assignment and Context-Specific Label Space (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11
draft-ietf-mpls-upstream-label-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (reviewed -04 for LC)
    
RTGMPLS Multicast Encapsulations (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 11
draft-ietf-mpls-multicast-encaps-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (reviewed -07 for LC)
    
RTGOSPF Based Layer 1 VPN Auto-Discovery (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 11
draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Avri Doria (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGBGP-based Auto-Discovery for Layer-1 VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11
draft-ietf-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGLDP extension for Inter-Area LSP (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 11
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-interarea-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (assigned LC)
    
APPIMAP CONVERT extension (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 11
draft-ietf-lemonade-convert-18.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Eric Burger is the document shepherd
Token: Chris Newman
  Reviewer:David Black (reviewed -17 for LC)
    
TSVUser-Defined Errors for RSVP (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 11
draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-user-error-spec-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo (reviewed -06 for LC)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
RTGOSPF for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-21.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: David Ward
  Reviewer: Christian Vogt (reviewed -18)
   

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPSimple Mail Transfer Protocol (Draft Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Lisa Dusseault
  Reviewer: Eric Gray (reviewed -08 for LC)
   
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSGuidelines for IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Testing (Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Nevil Brownlee is the PROTO shepherd
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Joel Halpern (reviewed -04 for LC)
    
OPSIPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Ron Bonica
  Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENThe Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) P-Served-User Private-Header (P-Header) (Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-vanelburg-sipping-served-user-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Francis Dupont (reviewed -04 for LC)
    
GENExperience of implementing NETCONF over SOAP (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-iijima-netconf-soap-implementation-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer: Christian Vogt (assigned LC 2/12)
   
3.2.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
INTSAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date (Experimental) - 1 of 1
draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Eric Gray (assigned LC)
   

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENThree-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 1
Licklider Transmission Protocol - Specification (Experimental) - 1 of 1
draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-09.txt
Note: Recommend RFC 3932 response #1: The IESG has not found any
conflict between this document and IETF work.
Licklider Transmission Protocol - Security Extensions (Experimental)
draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions-07.txt
Note: Recommend RFC 3932 response #1: The IESG has not found any
conflict between this document and IETF work.
Licklider Transmission Protocol - Motivation (Informational)
draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-motivation-06.txt
Note: Recommend RFC 3932 response #1: The IESG has not found any
conflict between this document and IETF work.
Token: Russ Housley
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE