Gen-Art Review Assignments for 15 Nov 2007

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-11-15).



2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RAIA Framework for Centralized Conferencing (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6
draft-ietf-xcon-framework-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Adam Roach is proto shepherd
    Note: Editor to produce version -10 prior on 11/09
Token: Cullen Jennings   
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (reviewed -09 for LC)
    
RAISession Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6
draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Christian Vogt (already reviewed for LC)
    
TSVNAT Behavioral Requirements for ICMP protocol (BCP) - 3 of 6
draft-ietf-behave-nat-icmp-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer:Miguel Garcia (reviewed -05 for LC)
    
TSVExplicit Congestion Marking in MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6
draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-mpls-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Lars Eggert (lars.eggert@nokia.com) is document shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:Pasi Eronen (already reviewed for LC)
    
RAITEI Query Request Number Change (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6
draft-ietf-sigtran-rfc4233update-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Christian Vogt (reviewed -01 for LC)
    
INTDistributing a Symmetric FMIPv6 Handover Key using SEND (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6
draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Vijay Devarapalli
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Miguel Garcia (already reviewed for LC)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENThe Presence-Specific Static Dictionary for Signaling Compression (Sigcomp) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-garcia-simple-presence-dictionary-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer: Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)
   
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
TSVNFS RDMA Problem Statement (Informational) - 1 of 5
draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler (spencer.shepler@sun.com)
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:David Black (already reviewed for LC)
    
RAISession Initiation Protocol (SIP) Torture Test Messages for Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) (Informational) - 2 of 5
draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-tests-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (reviewed -03 for LC)
    
INTNetwork Discovery and Selection Problem (Informational) - 3 of 5
draft-ietf-eap-netsel-problem-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
  Reviewer:David Black (already reviewed for LC)
    
TSVState of Peer-to-Peer(P2P) Communication Across Network Address Translators(NATs) (Informational) - 4 of 5
draft-ietf-behave-p2p-state-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer:Joel Halpern (already reviewed for 11/01)
    
SECCMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES) (Informational) - 5 of 5
draft-ietf-smime-cades-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer: Pasi Eronen (already reviewed for LC)
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
APPDec 1A Uniform Resource Name Namespace For The EPCglobal Electronic Product Code (EPC) and Related Standards (Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-mealling-epc-urn-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)
    
SECAdditional Diffie-Hellman Groups for use with IETF Standards (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-lepinski-dh-groups-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer: Ben Campbell (reviewed -01 for LC)
   

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
TSVMetrics for the Evaluation of Congestion Control Mechanisms (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: To be published according to draft-irtf-rfcs-01.txt Based on the Working Group Summary, I believe that the
second variant suggested in Appendix A of draft-irtf-rfcs-0
is appropriate for this document: "This document in not an IETF Internet Standard.  It represents
the individual opinion(s) of one or more members of the TMRG
Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force. It may be
considered for standardization by the IETF or adoption as a
IRTF Research Group consensus document in the future."
Token: Lars Eggert