Gen-ART Review Assignments for 18 October 2007

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-10-18). Originally, pulled from the server at 9:00 PM EDT on 10/11. Updated at 10:58 EDT on 10/12 to add late agenda items.

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area	Date
OPS	Mar 10	Signaling MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5
		draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-signaling-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Jean Francois Mule is the PROTO SHEPHERD of the document
	Token:	Dan Romascanu
	Reviewer:	Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)

RAI		Extended Secure RTP Profile for RTCP-based Feedback (RTP/SAVPF) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5
		draft-ietf-avt-profile-savpf-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: PROTO shepherd is Colin
	Token:	Cullen Jennings
	Reviewer:	Ben Campbell (already reviewed for LC)

RAI		Four-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 3 of 6
		Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) extension for Partial Notification of Presence Information (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6
		draft-ietf-simple-partial-notify-09.txt
	Reviewer:	Joel Halpern

		An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors (Proposed Standard)
		draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops-03.txt
	Reviewer:	Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)

		Presence Information Data format (PIDF) Extension for Partial Presence (Proposed Standard)
		draft-ietf-simple-partial-pidf-format-08.txt
	Reviewer:	Gonzalo Camarillo

		Publication of Partial Presence Information (Proposed Standard)
		draft-ietf-simple-partial-publish-06.txt
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	Francis Dupont

APP		A Domain Availability Check (dchk) Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5
		draft-ietf-crisp-iris-dchk-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: April Marine is Document Shepherd.
	Token:	Chris Newman
	Reviewer:	Elwyn Davies (reviewed -06 for LC)

APP		IMAP4 Extensions for Quick Mailbox Resynchronization (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5
		draft-ietf-lemonade-reconnect-client-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Chris Newman
	Reviewer:	Brian Carpenter (reviewed -05 for LC)

TSV		MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5
		draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Shepherd by responsible AD: Magnus Westerlund
	Token:	Magnus Westerlund
	Reviewer:	Miguel Garcia (reviewed -01 for LC)

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
INT		Multicast Group Membership Discovery MIB (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
		draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman
	Token:	Jari Arkko
	Reviewer:	Pasi Eronen (already reviewed)

RAI		Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
		draft-ietf-sip-answermode-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Keith is shepherd.
	Token:	Magnus Westerlund
	Reviewer:	Suresh Krishnan ( reviewed -04 for 9/6 & LC)

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area	Date
GEN		Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (BCP) - 1 of 1
		draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Russ Housley

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area	Date
TSV		Defining Network Capacity (Informational) - 1 of 3
		draft-ietf-ippm-bw-capacity-05.txt
		Note: Document Shepherd: Matt Zekauskas (matt@internet2.edu)
	Token:	Lars Eggert
	Reviewer:	Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC)

TSV		NFS RDMA Problem Statement (Informational) - 2 of 3
		draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfs-rdma-problem-statement-07.txt
		Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler (spencer.shepler@sun.com)
	Token:	Lars Eggert
	Reviewer:	David Black (already reviewed for LC)

OPS		Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) (Informational) - 3 of 3
		draft-ietf-radext-rfc3576bis-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Dan Romascanu
	Reviewer:	Ben Campbell (reviewed -09 for LC)

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
GEN		Experiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (Experimental) - 1 of 1
		draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: No document shepherd. Need to bring this back to the telechat
	Token:	Jari Arkko
	Reviewer:	Pasi Eronen (reviewed -02 for LC)

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE