Gen-ART Review Assignments for Oct. 4th, 2007

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-10-04).

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSOverview of the Internet Multicast Routing Architecture (BCP) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-mboned-routingarch-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (reviewed -09 for LC)
    
RTGIS-IS Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4
draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-isis-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (reviewed -05 for LC)
    
OPSPreventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks (BCP) - 3 of 4
draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
  Reviewer:Mark Allman (assigned for LC)
    
INTDeprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4
draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
OPSSpecification of the IPFIX Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: A previous version draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt of this draft was
already approved by the IESG. The IPFIX WG decided to make changes to that
version of the document with the principal goal of removing the SCTP
stream 0 restriction. Reviews should focus on the changes since
draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-24.txt which are mentioned in an editorial note
currently placed after the Table of Contents.
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Harald Alvestrand (assigned -24 for LC)
    
INTMulticast Group Membership Discovery MIB (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-magma-mgmd-mib-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd is Brian Haberman
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Pasi Eronen (already reviewed)
    
TSVIP Multicast Requirements for a Network Address (and port) Translator (NAT) (BCP) - 3 of 3
draft-ietf-behave-multicast-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Magnus Westerlund is Proto Shepherd
Token: Magnus Westerlund
Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC)

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APP URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-wilde-text-fragment-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Chris Newman
   Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins ( reviewed -06 for LC)
   
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPA Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-edwards-urn-smpte-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Chris Newman
  Reviewer:Eric Gray (already reviewed post-LC)
    
INTEAP-IKEv2 Method (Experimental) - 2 of 3
draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: There is no Document Shepherd.
Note: LC expires Oct 9, I will take this to the IESG 5 days before that
Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer:Robert Sparks (assigned for LC)
    
GENExperiment in Study Group Formation within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (Experimental) - 3 of 3
draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: No document shepherd.
Note: LC Expires Oct 8, will take this to IESG four days before that
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Pasi Eronen (assigned for LC)
   
3.2.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
SECDNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) IANA Registry (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE