Gen-Art Review Assignments for 10 May 2007

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-05-10).

Updated 18:2:26 EDT, May 3, 2007

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area	Date
SEC		The Incident Object Description Exchange Format (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7
		draft-ietf-inch-iodef-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Sam Hartman
	Reviewer:	Christian Vogt

SEC	Feb 24	OpenPGP Message Format (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7
		draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-22.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Sam Hartman
	Reviewer:	Miguel Garcia (reviewed -19 for IETF LC)

RAI		RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7
		draft-ietf-avt-ulp-21.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Colin is Shepherd.
	Token:	Cullen Jennings
	Reviewer::	Francis Dupont (already reviewed for LC)

RAI		A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for Instant Messaging (IM) Services (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 7
		draft-ietf-enum-im-service-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	David Black

APP		Sieve: An Email Filtering Language (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 7
		draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Lisa Dusseault
	Reviewer:	Sharon Chisholm (reviewed -09 for LC)

SEC		ESS Update: Adding CertID Algorithm Agility (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 7
		draft-ietf-smime-escertid-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Tim Polk
	Reviewer:	Francis Dupont (reviewed -04 for LC)

RTG		ICMP Extensions for MultiProtocol Label Switching (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 7
		draft-ietf-mpls-icmp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Ross Callon
	Reviewer:	Francis Dupont (already reviewed for LC)

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area	Date
GEN		Feed Paging and Archiving (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
		draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Lisa Dusseault
	Reviewer:	Eric Gray

APP		The LDAP entryDN Operational Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3
		draft-zeilenga-ldap-entrydn-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Chris Newman
	Reviewer:	Elwyn Davies (reviewed -01 for LC: Ready)

APP		Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF (Standard) - 3 of 3
		draft-crocker-rfc4234bis-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Lisa Dusseault
	Reviewer:	Lucy Lynch

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area	Date
RAI		Infrastrucure ENUM Requirements (Informational) - 1 of 1
		draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC)

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

Area	Date
APP		A Uniform Resource Name Namespace For The GSM Association (GSMA) and the International Mobile station Equipment Identity(IMEI) (Experimental) - 1 of 1
		draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Lisa Dusseault
	Reviewer:	Pasi Eronen

3.2.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
APP		The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (Informational) - 1 of 1
		draft-kunze-rfc2413bis-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Lisa Dusseault
	Reviewer:	Scott Brim (reviewed -05 for LC: Ready)

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.3.3 For Action

Area	Date
GEN		ODETTE File Transfer Protocol 2.0 (Informational) - 1 of 1
		draft-friend-oftp2-04.txt
	Token:	Russ Housley