GenART Review Assignment for 16 Nov 2006

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-11-16).

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

OPS

Information Model for IP Flow Information Export (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7

draft-ietf-ipfix-info-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Dan Romascanu

 

 

Reviewer:

Ron Bonica (reviewed -12 for LC)

 

 

 

 

INT

Mobile IPv6 Operation with IKEv2 and the revised IPsec Architecture (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7

draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-07.txt

Note: PROTO Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil <basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>

Token:

Jari Arkko

 

 

Reviewer:

Vijay Gurbani

 

 

 

 

INT

May 3

Mapping of IP/MPLS packets into IEEE 802.17 (Resilient packet ring) Networks (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7

draft-ietf-iporpr-basic-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley

 

 

Reviewer:

Miguel Garcia

 

 

 

 

INT

PWE3 ATM Transparent Cell Transport Service (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 7

draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt

Token:

Mark Townsley

 

 

Reviewer:

David Black (already reviewed for LC)

 

 

 

 

SEC

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 7

draft-ietf-dkim-base-06.txt

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Ron Bonica

 

 

 

 

OPS

Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 7

draft-ietf-hubmib-rfc3636bis-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Bert Wijnen is the PROTO shepherd

Token:

Dan Romascanu

 

 

Reviewer:

Pasi Eronen (already reviewed for LC)

 

 

 

 

TSV

RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Corrections and Clarifications to RFC 3095 (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 7

draft-ietf-rohc-rtp-impl-guide-22.txt [Open Web Ballot]

 

 

Token:

Magnus Westerlund

 

 

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -21 for LC)

 

 

2.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

INT

IP Version 6 over PPP (Draft Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-02.txt

Note: This was in IESG in 2005, though never on the agenda. Got to wait state because of lack of implementation reports from both sides of a test. This is now brought back to the IESG to either approve it as-is, or formally force the WG to downgrade this to PS.

 

 

Token:

Jari Arkko

 

 

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed for LC)

 

 

2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item
      NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

INT

Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 7

An Architecture for Provider Provisioned CE-based Virtual Private Networks using IPsec (Informational) - 1 of 7

draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-03.txt

Applicability Statement for Provider Provisioned CE-based Virtual Private Networks using IPsec (Informational)

draft-declercq-l3vpn-ce-based-as-00.txt

Token:

Mark Townsley

 

 

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand (already reviewed for LC)

 

 

 

 

INT

Three-Document ballot: - 2 of 7

Network based IP VPN Architecture Using Virtual Routers (Informational) - 2 of 7

draft-ietf-l3vpn-vpn-vr-03.txt

Using BGP as an Auto-Discovery Mechanism for VR-based Layer-3 VPNs (Informational)

draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgpvpn-auto-08.txt

Applicability Statement for Virtual Router-based Layer 3 PPVPN Approaches (Informational)

draft-ietf-l3vpn-as-vr-02.txt

Token:

Mark Townsley

 

 

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -03, -07, -02 respectively for LC)

 

 

 

 

APP

IMAP ANNOTATE Extension (Experimental) - 3 of 7

draft-ietf-imapext-annotate-16.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Lisa Dusseault

 

 

Reviewer:

Robert Sparks

 

 

 

 

INT

Address Resolution Mechanisms for IP Datagrams over MPEG-2 Networks (Informational) - 4 of 7

draft-ietf-ipdvb-ar-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley

 

 

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern  (already reviewed for LC)

 

 

 

 

INT

Security Threats to Network-Based Localized Mobility Management (Informational) - 5 of 7

draft-ietf-netlmm-threats-04.txt

Token:

Jari Arkko

 

 

Reviewer:

Francis Dupont

 

 

 

 

INT

IP Address Location Privacy and Mobile IPv6: Problem Statement (Informational) - 6 of 7

draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: PROTO Shepherd is Gopal Dommety <gdommety@cisco>.
NOTE: There are RFC Editor notes!

Token:

Jari Arkko

 

 

Reviewer:

Scott Brim

 

 

 

 

INT

Two-Document ballot: - 7 of 7

Network Mobility Route Optimization Problem Statement (Informational) - 7 of 7

draft-ietf-nemo-ro-problem-statement-03.txt

Note: Proto shepherd is TJ Kniveton <tj@kniveton.com>

   Reviewer: Sharon Chisholm
      

Network Mobility Route Optimization Solution Space Analysis (Informational)

draft-ietf-nemo-ro-space-analysis-03.txt

Note: Proto shepherd is TJ Kniveton <tj@kniveton.com>

 

 

Token:

Jari Arkko

 

 

Reviewer:

Gonzalo Camarillo

 

 

3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

GEN

Jun 27

Document Shepherding from Working Group Last Call to Publication (Informational) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Brian Carpenter

SEC

Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5 (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-bellovin-keyroll2385-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

 

 

Token:

Russ Housley

 

 

Reviewer:

Robert Sparks

 

 

3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

INT

A Taxonomy and Analysis of Enhancements to Mobile IPv6 Route Optimization (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-irtf-mobopts-ro-enhancements-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley