Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-05-11).
Updated
18:2:12 EDT, May 4, 2006
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
|||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTG |
Routing IPv6 with IS-IS (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed for LC on 7 Feb) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
OPS |
Mar 8 |
MIB for Fibre-Channel's Fabric Shortest Path First Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4 |
||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Scott Brim (reviewed -02 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
OPS |
Mar 8 |
Fibre-Channel Routing Information MIB (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4 |
||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -03 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Link Management Protocol (LMP) Management Information Base (MIB) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 |
|||||||||
Note: [Note: IETF Last Call ends 5/9, 2 days before the telechat; while I don't expect any Last Call comments if there are any substantive ones I may remove it from the telechat to deal with them] |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
RTG |
Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 (Draft Standard) - 1 of 3 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern (reviewed -07 for LC and 1 December 05) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Extensions for Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Control (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Francis Dupont (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
TSV |
Packet Reordering Metric for IPPM (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 |
|||||||||
Note: PROTO shepherd: Henk Uijterwaal (henk.uijterwaal@ripe.net) |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Sharon Chisholm (reviewed -11 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
SEC |
IPsec Security Policy Database Configuration MIB (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney (already reviewed for 27 April) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
GEN |
The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed -02 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTG |
Evaluation of existing Routing Protocols against ASON routing requirements (Informational) - 1 of 2 |
||||||
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-eval-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||
Token: |
|||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black |
||||||
|
|
||||||
SEC |
Design of the MOBIKE Protocol (Informational) - 2 of 2 |
||||||
Note: PROTO Shepherd: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@vpnc.org> |
|||||||
Token: |
|||||||
Reviewer: |
Eric Gray |
||||||
|
|
||||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||
SEC |
ECP Groups For IKE and IKEv2 (Informational) - 1 of 2 |
||||||
Token: |
|||||||
Reviewer: |
Ron Bonica |
||||||
|
|
||||||
APP |
A URN Namespace for ASD Specification 1000D (Informational) - 2 of 2 |
||||||
Token: |
|||||||
Reviewer: |
Tom Taylor |
||||||
|
|
||||||
3.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||