Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-02-16).
Updated
18:3:16 EDT, February 9, 2006
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
| 
			 
  | 
		
			2.1 WG Submissions | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 2.1.1 New Item  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Feb 9  | 
		
			 Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 10  | 
	||||||||
| 
			 Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Framework (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: IETF Last Call still in progress, ends Monday Feb 13.  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) MIB (Proposed Standard)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Transport Mappings for Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) (Proposed Standard)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Jan 30  | 
		
			 Multimedia Terminal Adapter (MTA) Management Information Base for PacketCable and IPCablecom compliant devices (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10  | 
	||||||||
| 
			 Note: Still in IETF Last Call, which ends Feb 13 (Monday);   | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement (BCP) - 3 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 The Key ID Information Type for the General Extension Payload in MIKEY (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (reviewed -01 for LC on 8 July 2005)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Feb 9  | 
		
			 Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10  | 
	||||||||
| 
			 Note: A new rev is expected Feb 9 or 10 to address some AD
			review comments and a comment from Sam Hartman on MD5 usage.  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Scott Brim  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 7 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 LDP Specification (Draft Standard) - 7 of 10  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Experience with the LDP protocol (Informational)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 LDP Implementation Survey Results (Informational)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 David Black  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 8 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Public Key Cryptography for Initial Authentication in Kerberos (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: proto shepherd: jhutz@cmu.edu  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 OCSP Support for PKINIT (Proposed Standard)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Minor comment about security considerations sent to WG. I'm holding this draft until pkinit catches up.  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (reviewed -33 and -06 for LC)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile. (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: Proto shepherd is Steve Kent <kent@bbn.com>  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Michael Patton  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 RAI  | 
		
			 Suppression of Session Initiation Protocol REFER Method Implicit Subscription (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-sip-refer-with-norefersub-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: PROTO shepherd dean.willis@softarmor.com Last Call ends 2/17. On IESG agenda 2/16. Comments encouraged to the end.  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 2.1.2 Returning Item  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Subcodes for BGP Cease Notification Message (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Mary Barnes (Lakshminath Dondeti reviewed -05 for LC on 25 April 2005)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide."  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 2 Feb 2006)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide."  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 2 Feb 2006)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions (revised) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (reviewed -04 on 26 Sept 2005)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: The PROTO Shepherd for this document is Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>.  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (reviewed -05 for LC)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 Sieve Extension: Relational Tests (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: Document shepherd is Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand (already reviewed for LC)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
			2.2 Individual Submissions | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 2.2.1 New Item   | 
		|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.1.1 New Item  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 DHCP: IPv4 and IPv6 Dual-Stack Issues (Informational) - 1 of 4  | 
	||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 RAI  | 
		
			 Trait-based Authorization Requirements for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) - 2 of 4  | 
	||||
| 
			 Note: PROTO shepherd gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com  | 
	|||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Feb 9  | 
		
			 Evaluation of Candidate CAPWAP Protocols (Informational) - 3 of 4  | 
	|||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Feb 9  | 
		
			 Objectives for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) (Informational) - 4 of 4  | 
	|||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 3.1.2 Returning Item  | 
	|||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem statement (Informational) - 1 of 1  | 
	||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for 18 Aug 2005)  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
			3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable  | 
	|||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.2.1 New Item  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||
| 
			 TSV  | 
		
			 SDP Descriptors for FLUTE (Experimental) - 1 of 2  | 
	||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 Repeated Authentication in IKEv2 (Informational) - 2 of 2  | 
	||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern (reviewed -04 for LC)  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 3.2.2 Returning Item   | 
	|||||
			3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorThe IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not  | 
	|||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.3.1 New Item  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||
| 
			 GEN  | 
		
			 Simple Middlebox Configuration (SIMCO) Protocol Version 3.0 (Experimental) - 1 of 1  | 
	||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||
| 
			 3.3.2 Returning Item   | 
	|||||