Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-12-01).
Updated
10:2:21 EDT, November 28, 2005
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
| 
			 
  | 
		
			2.1 WG Submissions | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 2.1.1 New Item  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Detecting MPLS Data Plane Failures (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: ITU requires an RFC number by December 12th.  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 David Black (already reviewed for 10/27)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Four-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 20  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Note: 11/21/05:Â Check for last minute IETF LC comments before telechat.  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 A DNS RR for Encoding DHCP Information (DHCID RR) (Proposed Standard)  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 The DHCP Client FQDN Option (Proposed Standard)  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Note: 3 related DDNS documents need to be reconciled. See email to dhcwg list on 2003-06-05.  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 The DHCPv6 Client FQDN Option (Proposed Standard)  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 TSV  | 
		
			 Definitions of Managed Objects for FCIP (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: PROTO shepherd black_david@emc.com  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 (Draft Standard) - 4 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Nov 15  | 
		
			 Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base Version 2 (Draft Standard) - 5 of 20  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Mobile IPv4 Dynamic Home Agent Assignment (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern (reviewed -05 for 18 Aug Telechat)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 TSV  | 
		
			 Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3) - User Adaptation Layer (M3UA) (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 David Black (reviewed -04 for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Avoiding Equal Cost Multipath Treatment in MPLS Networks (BCP) - 8 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney (reviewed -01 for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Foreign Agent Error Extension for Mobile IPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand (reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 CIPID: Contact Information in Presence Information Data Format (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins (reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: The proto write-up (available in tracker comment log)
			discusses why this document was not combined with cipid and
			future, despite them being interconnected.  Rough consensus
			for this approach does  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 David Black (reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 Timed Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) to Indicate Status Information for Past and Future Time Intervals (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Avri Doria (assigned for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 13 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Note: Bernard Aboba is the proto shepherd  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Nov 17  | 
		
			 Transmission of IPv6, IPv4 and ARP Packets over Fibre Channel (Proposed Standard) - 14 of 20  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-imss-ip-over-fibre-channel-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Lakshminath Dondeti  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 DHCPv6 Relay Agent Remote ID Option (Proposed Standard) - 15 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Lakshminath Dondeti  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 DHCPv6 Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option (Proposed Standard) - 16 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Scott Brim  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 TSV  | 
		
			 An ENUM Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service (Proposed Standard) - 17 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Finishes Last Call on October 27. On IESG agenda, however LC comments urged and will be heeded.  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Management Information Base for IS-IS (Proposed Standard) - 18 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 David Black (reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 A Data Model for Presence (Proposed Standard) - 19 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Much of the language here reflects long discussion and compromise. Please recognize that when suggesting wordsmithing changes.  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Elwyn Davies (reviewed for LC)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 20 of 20  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 A PRF API extension for the GSS-API (Proposed Standard) - 20 of 20  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Note: proto shepherd: jaltman@columbia.edu  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 A PRF for the Kerberos V GSS-API Mechanism (Proposed Standard)  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Scott Brim  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 2.1.2 Returning Item  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||
| 
			 TSV  | 
		
			 Jun 18  | 
		
			 SDP: Session Description Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: Ancient returning item: no longer has enough ballot positions to advance. Mercy for these poor souls, new reviewers!  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 Mapping Between the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) and Internet Mail (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: This is returning post-appeal processing by the WG and post replacement IETF Last Call. If we can complete this on 12/1, it will likely be referenced by OMA (currently the text is copied)  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Michael Patton (reviewed previously)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Detecting Network Attachment in IPv4 (DNAv4) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: This document has changed substantially since the IESG reviewed version -12 based on post-LC comments. Back for a re-review before sending to the RFC Editor.  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney (reviewed -11, Mary re-reviewed -12)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
			2.2 Individual Submissions | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 2.2.1 New Item  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 RIPv2 Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for LC)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 2.2.2 Returning Item   | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.1.1 New Item  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
			 TSV  | 
		
			 A Framework for Supporting Emergency Telecommunications Services (ETS) Within a Single Administrative Domain (Informational) - 1 of 5  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 BGP MED Considerations (Informational) - 2 of 5  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-grow-bgp-med-considerations-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Note: Dave Meyer is the protoshepherd  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 3 of 5  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 OAM Requirements for MPLS Networks (Informational) - 3 of 5  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Note: ITU requires an RFC number by December 12th.  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 A Framework for MPLS Operations and Management (OAM) (Informational)  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 David Black  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 Signaling Requirements for Point to Multipoint Traffic Engineered MPLS LSPs (Informational) - 4 of 5  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Harald Alvestrand  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 NEMO Home Network models (Informational) - 5 of 5  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Scott Brim  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 3.1.2 Returning Item  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Operational Considerations and Issues with IPv6 DNS (Informational) - 1 of 1  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Note: To check (for the second time) on the status of the resolution of Thomas Narten/Margaret Wasserman's DISCUSS.  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Michael Patton (reviewed previously)  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
			3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.2.1 New Item   | 
		||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||||||||||
| 
			 SEC  | 
		
			 UMAC: Message Authentication Code using Universal Hashing (Informational) - 1 of 1  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
			3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorThe IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.3.1 New Item  | 
		||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||||||||||
| 
			 GEN  | 
		
			 Nov 23  | 
		
			 The Managed Object Aggregation MIB (Informational) - 1 of 1  | 
	|||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Reviewer:  | 
		
			 Lakshminath Dondeti  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 3.3.2 Returning Item   | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 3.3.3 For Action  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 DISCOVER: Supporting Multicast DNS Queries (Experimental) - 1 of 1  | 
	||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Note: Note: Submitted to RFC Editor, being treated as an ISR.  | 
	|||||||||||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||||||||||