GenART Review Assignment for 27 October 2005

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-10-27).

Updated 18:2:18 EDT, October 20, 2005

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

RTG

Detecting MPLS Data Plane Failures (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6

draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

David Black (reviewed -09 for LC)



RTG

Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 6

Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6

draft-ietf-pim-sm-v2-new-11.txt

PIM Sparse-Mode IETF Proposed Standard Requirements Analysis (Informational)

draft-ietf-pim-proposed-req-01.txt

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed)



TSV

XDR: External Data Representation Standard (Standard) - 3 of 6

draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jon Peterson

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand



OPS

Chargeable User Identity (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6

draft-ietf-radext-chargeable-user-id-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

David Kessens

Reviewer:

David Black (reviewed -05 for LC)



APP

Sieve Extension: Variables (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6

draft-ietf-sieve-variables-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document shepherd is Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

John Loughney



TSV

An ENUM Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6

draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Finishes Last Call on October 27.  On IESG agenda, however LC comments urged and will be heeded.

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies



2.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

APP

Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 1

Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) CATENATE Extension (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt

Note: Checking for revised DISCUSSes based on updates

Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - URLAUTH Extension (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-lemonade-urlauth-08.txt

Message Submission BURL Extension (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-lemonade-burl-03.txt

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Lakshminath Dondeti (reviewed -05, -07 and -02 previously)



2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

APP

Guidelines and Registration Procedures for new URI Schemes (BCP) - 1 of 2

draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -05 for LC)



APP

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Binary Encoding Option (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-legg-ldap-binary-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Avri Doria



2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

TSV

Emergency Telecommunications Services (ETS) Requirements for a Single Administrative Domain (Informational) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-ieprep-domain-req-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Note the RFC-Editor note that removes the reference in the Abstract.

Token:

Jon Peterson

Reviewer:

Scott Brim



TSV

Requirements for Floor Control Protocol (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-xcon-floor-control-req-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: This was meant to go on the agenda when we considered draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp, but
the AD mislaid the request and thought wrongly this wasn't intended for ultimate publication.

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

None: this version of the doc is expired!



3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

APP

XHTML+Voice - application/xv+xml (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-mccobb-xv-media-type-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Lakshminath Dondeti



3.2.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

APP

LDAP Bulk Update/Replication Protocol (Informational) - 1 of 2

draft-rharrison-lburp-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Lakshminath Dondeti (reviewed -04 for LC)



APP

The "info" URI Scheme for Information Assets with Identifiers in Public Namespaces (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-vandesompel-info-uri-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Handling may depend on the results of review of APP draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (reviewed -02)



3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE