GenART Review Assignment for 18 Aug 2005

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-08-18).

Updated 10:21:57 EDT, August 5, 2005

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

INT

Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Ethernet Over MPLS Networks (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-pwe3-ethernet-encap-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern



INT

PWE3 Control Word for use over an MPLS PSN (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-pwe3-cw-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

John Loughney



2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item
      NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

INT

Low Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4 (Experimental) - 1 of 3

draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-10.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Lakshminath Dondeti



INT

Extension to Sockets API for Mobile IPv6 (Informational) - 2 of 3

draft-ietf-mip6-mipext-advapi-04.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Mark Allman



INT

Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem statement (Informational) - 3 of 3

draft-ietf-mip6-firewalls-02.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins



3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

SEC

Additional cryptographic algorithms for use with GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms. (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-popov-cryptopro-cpalgs-03.txt

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Avri Doria



3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE