GenART Review Assignment for 21 July 2005

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-07-21).

Updated 18:24:13 EDT, July 14, 2005

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

Area

Date

RTG

Graceful Restart Mechanism for BGP with MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6

draft-ietf-mpls-bgp-mpls-restart-04.txt [Open Text Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

John Loughney



APP

Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 6

NNTP Extension for Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6

draft-ietf-nntpext-authinfo-09.txt

Note: Document shepherd: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>

Using TLS with NNTP (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-nntpext-tls-nntp-07.txt

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Lakshminath Dondeti



RTG

Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6

draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern



INT

Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance using the Label Distribution Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6

draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-17.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins



SEC

Certificate Extensions and Attributes Supporting Authentication in Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6

draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: proto shepherd: tim.polk@nist.gov

Token:

Sam Hartman

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (Already reviewed for LC – Ready)



APP

NNTP Extension for Streaming Feeds (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6

draft-ietf-nntpext-streaming-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document shepherd: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (Reviewed -05 for LC – Almost Ready)



2.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

RTG

BGP Extended Communities Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-communities-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Return to agenda to see if Russ is OK with the security considerations.

Token:

Bill Fenner

Reviewer:

Mark Allman (Reviewed -08 – Not Ready)



RTG

Encoding of Attributes for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Establishment Using RSVP-TE (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3

draft-ietf-mpls-rsvpte-attributes-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

John Loughney (Reviewed -04 – Not Ready)



APP

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3

draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Back on to check RFC Editor notes

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (Already reviewed – Ready with nit)



2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

TSV

MIME Type Registration for MPEG-4 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3

draft-lim-mpeg4-mime-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: To IESG and I'll hold a Discuss until Last Call ends (MPEG needs before end of summer)

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Mark Allman



TSV

MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia files (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3

draft-garudadri-avt-3gpp2-mime-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: To IESG and I'll hold in Discuss until Last Call ends (3GPP2 deadline this summer)

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

David Black (LC ends 08 Aug)



APP

Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3

draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (Already reviewed)



2.2.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

APP

Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures (BCP) - 1 of 1

draft-freed-media-type-reg-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Returning to discuss the last remaining discuss.

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (Reviewed -02)



3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

TSV

Session Description Protocol Offer/Answer Examples (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-mmusic-offer-answer-examples-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jon Peterson

Reviewer:

Suzanne Woolf



3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item
      NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

APP

HTTP Header Field Registrations (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies



3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE