GenART assignments – 12 May 2005

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-05-12).

Updated 18:18:51 EDT, May 5, 2005

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area

Date

TSV

RTP Payload Format for BroadVoice Speech Codecs (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5

draft-ietf-avt-rtp-bv-04.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Review

David Black

INT

Information Refresh Time Option for DHCPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5

draft-ietf-dhc-lifetime-03.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Review

John Loughney assigned in IETF LC

INT

Vendor-Specific Information Suboption for the DHCP Relay Agent Option (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5

draft-ietf-dhc-vendor-suboption-00.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Review

Suzanne Woolf assigned for previous telechat

INT

Node-Specific Client Identifiers for DHCPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5

draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-04.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Review

Lucy Lynch assigned in IETF LC

INT

IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture (Draft Standard) - 5 of 5

draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-03.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Review

Mary Barnes

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area

Date

SEC

Datagram Transport Layer Security (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3

draft-rescorla-dtls-04.txt

Token:

Russ Housley

Review

Joel Halpern reviewed -04 for IETF LC

SEC

The Camellia Cipher Algorithm and Its Use With IPsec (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3

draft-kato-ipsec-ciph-camellia-01.txt

Token:

Russ Housley

Review

Scott Brim reviewed -01 for IETF LC

APP

Using the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) in Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3

draft-mrose-rfc3288bis-01.txt

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Review

Lakshminath Dondetil; Spencer Dawkins assigned for IETF LC but is not available

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
APP		Attaching Meaning to Solicitation Class Keywords (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
		draft-malamud-keyword-discovery-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Returning to clear the last discuss.
	Token:	Scott Hollenbeck
	Review	Scott Brim; Spenser Dawkins reviewed -03 previously but is not available

3. Document Actions

					Area			Date
3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
			3.1.1 New Item
					TSV						A Framework for Conferencing with the Session Initiation Protocol (Informational) - 1 of 2
											draft-ietf-sipping-conferencing-framework-04.txt
								Token:			Allison Mankin
								Review			Joel Halpern

					TSV						High Level Requirements for Tightly Coupled SIP Conferencing (Informational) - 2 of 2
											draft-ietf-sipping-conferencing-requirements-01.txt
											Note: PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
								Token:			Allison Mankin
								Review			Mark Allman

			3.1.2 Returning Item NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
	3.2.1 New Item
				Area			Date
				APP						Implementer-friendly Specification of Message and MIME-Part Header Fields and Field Components (Informational) - 1 of 1
										draft-lilly-field-specification-03.txt
							Token:			Scott Hollenbeck
							Review			Michael Patton

	3.2.2 Returning Item NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document represent an end run around the IETF's working groups or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.
			3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE
3.3.3 For Action
		Area				Date
		GEN							How to Gain Prominence and Influence in Standards Organizations (Informational) - 1 of 1
									draft-eastlake-prominence-02.txt
									Note: Author has been pointed at the RFC Editor's independent submission mechanism.
						Token:			Brian Carpenter
						Review			Elwyn Davies

GenART assignments – 12 May 2005

2. Protocol Actions

2.1 WG Submissions

2.2 Individual Submissions

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor