GenArt Assignment List

1

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

				Area	Date
	2.1 WG Submissions
		2.1.1 New Item
				TSV		An INVITE Inititiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
						draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-05.txt
					Token:	Allison Mankin
					Review:	Michael Patton – Reviewed already for last meeting

				TSV		An Extension to the Session Initiation Protocol for Request History Information (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
						draft-ietf-sip-history-info-06.txt
					Token:	Allison Mankin
					Review	Michael Patton Assigned in IETF LC

		2.1.2 Returning Item NONE
	2.2 Individual Submissions
			2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE

3. Document Actions

	3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
		3.1.1 New Item NONE 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE
	3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
		3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE
	3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document represent an end run around the IETF's working groups or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.
		3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE