Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-03-31).
Updated
18:19:22 EDT, March 24, 2005
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
|||||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSV |
Interworking between SIP and QSIG (BCP) - 1 of 6 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Scott Brim – reviewed -04 in IETF LC |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TSV |
A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Key Press Stimulus (KPML) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Lucy Lynch – assigned -07 in IETF LC |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TSV |
An INVITE Inititiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Michael Patton – assigned -05 in IETF LC |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
SEC |
The Simple and Protected GSS-API Negotiation Mechanism (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6 |
|||||||||||
Note: proto shepherd: jaltman@columbia.edu |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Spencer Dawkins – assigned -05 in IETF LC |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
INT |
IPv6 Host to Router Load Sharing (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Mary Barnes |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
INT |
Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6 |
|||||||||||
Note: 2005-01-25: AD review raises some questions, then to IETF LC. |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Mark Allman – assigned -05 in IETF LC |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||||
Five-Document ballot: - 1 of 3 |
||||||||||||
SSH Protocol Architecture (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Joel Halpern |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Note: IPR Issues have greatly delayed this block of documents. At IETF 62, the IPR WG gave advice that has been included in these documents. By approving these documents, the IESG will be approving the approach recommended by the IPR WG. |
||||||||||||
SSH Connection Protocol (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||||
Review: |
John Loughney |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SSH Transport Layer Protocol (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Lakshminath Dondeti |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SSH Authentication Protocol (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Mary Barnes |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
SSH Protocol Assigned Numbers (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Michael Patton |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TSV |
RTP Retransmission Payload Format (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Suzanne Woolf – assigned -11 in IETF LC |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
SEC |
Sep 26 |
IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 |
||||||||||
Note: Placed on 2005-03-31 agenda to confirm resolution of discuss positions. |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Scott Brim - Was Brian Carpenter (reviewed -09) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
||||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||||
APP |
Attaching Meaning to Solicitation Class Keywords (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Spencer Dawkins |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
APP |
Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF (Draft Standard) - 2 of 2 |
|||||||||||
Note: This document obsoletes RFC 2234. It was produced to address comments received during the IESG evaluation of moving 2234 to Draft Standard status. |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Suzanne Woolf |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPS |
IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server Information Approaches (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||
Note: Back to the IESG to check new version |
|||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Joel Halpern – reviewed -04 |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||
APP |
Policy-Mandated Labels Such as "Adv:" in Email Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best (Informational) - 1 of 2 |
||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Elwyn Davies |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
APP |
Common Format and MIME Type for CSV Files (Informational) - 2 of 2 |
||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
3.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorReviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document |
|||||||||||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||
INT |
MAC-Forced Forwarding: A Method for Traffic Separation on an Ethernet Access Network (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||
Note: Back on agenda to resolve IPv6 issues noted by Margaret. |
|||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Elwyn Davies – Reviewed -03 |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||