GenART Assignments

1. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

			Area		Date
2.1 WG Submissions
	2.1.1 New Item
			TSV				Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
							draft-ietf-avt-text-red-05.txt
					Token:		Allison Mankin
					Review		Elwyn Davies

			RTG				Encoding of Attributes for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Establishment Using RSVP-TE (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3
							draft-ietf-mpls-rsvpte-attributes-04.txt
					Token:		Alex Zinin
					Review		John Loughney (Reviewed -04 already)

			SEC				The Use of RSA Signatures within ESP and AH (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3
							draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-signatures-04.txt
					Token:		Russ Housley
					Review		Lucy Lynch (Reviewed -04 already)

	2.1.2 Returning Item
				Area		Date
				RTG				Prioritized Treatment of Specific OSPF Packets and Congestion Avoidance (BCP) - 1 of 1
								draft-ietf-ospf-scalability-09.txt
								Note: Checking if -09 fixes concerns
						Token:		Bill Fenner
						Review		Joel Halpern (Spencer Reviewed -08 but he is vacationing this week)


2.2 Individual Submissions
		2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE

3. Document Actions

	3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
		3.1.1 New Item NONE 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE
	3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
		3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE
	3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document represent an end run around the IETF's working groups or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.
		3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE

GenART Assignments

1. Protocol Actions

2.1 WG Submissions

2.2 Individual Submissions

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor