Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-01-06).
Updated
15:22:38 EDT, December 30, 2004
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
|||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTG |
Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5 |
|||||||||
Note: Participant in PROTO Team Pilot: |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Spencer Dawkins |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 5 |
|||||||||
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Recovery Functional Specification (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5 |
||||||||||
Note: Target Category is PS, not INFO as the doc says |
||||||||||
Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) (Informational) |
||||||||||
Note: Target Category is INFO, not PS as the doc says |
||||||||||
Analysis of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)-based Recovery Mechanisms (including Protection and Restoration) (Informational) |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Lucy Lynch |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Generalize Multiprotocol Label Switching(GMPLS) User-Network Interface (UNI): Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Support for the Overlay Model (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5 |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Spencer Dawkins |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Brian Carpenter - done |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
APP |
Three-Document ballot: - 5 of 5 |
|||||||||
LDAP:String Representation of Distinguished Names (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5 |
||||||||||
LDAP: String Representation of Search Filters (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
LDAP: Directory Information Models (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Scott Brim - done |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
APP |
Full-mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail: FFPIM (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6 |
|||||||||
Note: Returning because there aren't enough positive ballots for approval. All old discusses have been cleared. NOTE: doc has been updated to -08 from -07 since the document was placed on the agenda. |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Scott Brim |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SUB |
Dec 30 |
Four-Document ballot: - 2 of 6 |
||||||||
Protocol extensions for support of Differentiated-Service-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6 |
||||||||||
Note: Back on Agenda to see if we can get the DISCUSSes
cleared. |
||||||||||
Maximum Allocation Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering (Experimental) |
||||||||||
Max Allocation with Reservation Bandwidth Constraint Model for MPLS/DiffServ TE & Performance Comparisons (Experimental) |
||||||||||
Russian Dolls Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering (Experimental) |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
No Assignment since this is just to remove DISCUSSes |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Authentication/Confidentiality for OSPFv3 (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6 |
|||||||||
Note: Participant in PROTO Team pilot: |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Joel Halpern |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Sep 26 |
IP Authentication Header (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6 |
||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Elwyn Davies |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Aug 4 |
Extended Sequence Number Addendum to IPsec DOI for ISAKMP (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6 |
||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Suzanne Woolf |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Sep 26 |
IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6 |
||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
Brian Carpenter |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
INT |
Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Review |
John Loughney |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APP |
Goals for Internet Messaging to Support Diverse Service Environments (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||||
Token: |
|||||||
Review |
Mark Allman |
||||||
|
|
||||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorReviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document |
|||||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||
INT |
Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for IPv4, IPv6 and OSI (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||||
Note: 2004-11-24: Successful NTP BOF in Washington DC. This
document will be |
|||||||
Token: |
|||||||
Review |
Michael Patton |
||||||
|
|
||||||