Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
| 
			 
  | 
		
			2.1 WG Submissions | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 2.1.1 New Item  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: 2004-11-24: Ready for full IESG review. Also, depends
			on  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Lucy Lynch  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Multicast Router Discovery (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Mary Barnes  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 GEN  | 
		
			 RTP Payload for Text Conversation (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Note: text/red is in revision to be text payload types only  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Michael Patton  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 2.1.2 Returning Item  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		||||||||
| 
			 RTG  | 
		
			 
  | 
		
			 Eight-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 1  | 
	||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) (Draft Standard) - 1 of 1  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Brian Carpenter  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Note: Back on the agenda to resolve remaining DISCUSS'es  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 BGP 4 Implementation Report (Informational)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Mary Barnes  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Definitions of Managed Objects for the Fourth Version of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4) (Proposed Standard)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 BGP Security Vulnerabilities Analysis (Informational)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Kent Crispin  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 BGP-4 Protocol Analysis (Informational)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Lucy Lynch  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Experience with the BGP-4 Protocol (Informational)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Suzanne Wolf (original done by Mark Allman but he is not available)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 BGP MIB V1 implementation survey (Informational)  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Michael Patton  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Standards Maturity Variance Regarding the TCP MD5 Signature Option (RFC 2385) and the BGP-4 Specification (Informational)  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	|||||||||
			2.2 Individual Submissions | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 2.2.1 New Item   | 
		|||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.1.1 New Item  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 Goals (Informational) - 1 of 3  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Spencer Dawkins  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 Threats relating to IPv6 multihoming solutions (Informational) - 2 of 3  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-threats-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Suzanne Woolf  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 OPS  | 
		
			 IPv6 Multicast Deployment Issues (Informational) - 3 of 3  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 draft-ietf-mboned-ipv6-multicast-issues-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Brian Carpenter  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 3.1.2 Returning Item   | 
	|||||||||||
			3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.2.1 New Item  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 Area  | 
		
			 Date  | 
		|||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA) (Informational) - 1 of 4  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: 2004-11-23: Ready for full IESG review (when -14
			appears). Note:  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Joel Halpern  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 INT  | 
		
			 Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for GSM Subscriber Identity Modules (EAP-SIM) (Informational) - 2 of 4  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Note: 2004-11-23: Ready for full IESG review (when -15
			appears). Note:  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 John Loughney  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 APP  | 
		
			 The 'info' URI Scheme for Information Assets with Identifiers in Public Namespaces (Informational) - 3 of 4  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Kent Crispin  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 GEN  | 
		
			 Using Universal Content Identifier as Uniform Resource Names (Informational) - 4 of 4  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||||||||||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Scott Brim  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||||||||||
| 
			 3.2.2 Returning Item   | 
	|||||||||||
			3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorReviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document  | 
	|||||||||||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 3.3.1 New Item   | 
		||||||||||
| 
			 IAB  | 
		
			 
  | 
	||
| 
			 Token:  | 
		|||
| 
			 Review:  | 
		
			 Scot Brim  | 
	||
| 
			 
  | 
		
			 
  |