Review Assignments for 041118

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area

Date

TSV

E.164 Number Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-enum-epp-e164-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Allison Mankin

Review

Suzanne Woolf

SUB

Use of PE-PE GRE or IP in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-l3vpn-gre-ip-2547-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: 2004-10-21: Ready for IESG review.

Token:

Thomas Narten

Review

Mary Barnes

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area

Date

SEC

Protecting Multiple Contents with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-housley-contentcollection-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Sam Hartman

Review

Michel Patton

SEC

The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec ESP (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-gcm-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Review

Spencer Dawkins

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
APP	Jul 8	LDAP 'Who am I?' Operation (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
		draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid-09.txt [Open Text Ballot]
		Note: On Agenda to confirm that Russ's discuss can clear
	Token:	Ted Hardie
	Review	John Loughney

3. Document Actions

			Area		Date
3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
	3.1.1 New Item
			SEC				Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Certification Path Building (Informational) - 1 of 2
							draft-ietf-pkix-certpathbuild-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
					Token:		Russ Housley
					Review		Brian Carpenter

			OPS				IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server Information Approaches (Informational) - 2 of 2
							draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
					Token:		David Kessens
					Review		Joel Halpern

	3.1.2 Returning Item NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
		3.2.1 New Item
				Area		Date
				SEC				The SEED Encryption Algorithm (Informational) - 1 of 1
								draft-park-seed-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
						Token:		Russ Housley
						Review		Kent Crispin

		3.2.2 Returning Item NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document represent an end run around the IETF's working groups or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.
		3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE

Review Assignments for 041118

2. Protocol Actions

2.1 WG Submissions

2.2 Individual Submissions

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor