Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
|||||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSV |
Connection-Oriented Media Transport in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 5 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Joel Halpern |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TSV |
Fibre Channel Management MIB (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 5 |
|||||||||||
Note: This was developed by IPS because experts were present
and there was need for fresh start on |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Mark Allman |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
TSV |
ISDN Q.921-User Adaptation Layer (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Mary Barnes |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
INT |
Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Michael Patton |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
RTG |
Source-Specific Multicast for IP (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Spencer Dawkins |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||||
TSV |
Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 2 (MTP2) - User Peer-to-Peer Adaptation Layer (M2PA) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 |
|||||||||||
Note: Returning item to clear discuss |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
John Loughney - don't think it has changed since the last pass |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
SEC |
The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 |
|||||||||||
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
||||||||||||
Note: On IESG Telechat agenda to see if the new version clears the remaining DISCUSS ballots. |
||||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Joel Halpern |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
||||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||||
APP |
Securing FTP with TLS (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
John Loughney |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
APP |
Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Mary Barnes |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
GEN |
Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax (Standard) - 3 of 3 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||||
Review: |
Spencer Dawkins |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INT |
Extensions to support efficient carrying of multicast traffic in Layer-2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) (Experimental) - 1 of 3 |
||||||||||||
Note: 2004-10-06: magma chairs OK with -04; ready for IESG review. |
|||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Brian Carpenter |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
OPS |
Oct 6 |
Architecture Taxonomy for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points(CAPWAP) (Informational) - 2 of 3 |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
INT |
Renumbering Requirements for Stateless DHCPv6 (Informational) - 3 of 3 |
||||||||||||
draft-ietf-dhc-stateless-dhcpv6-renumbering-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
John Loughney |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||
OPS |
Jan 2 |
Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||||
Considerations When Using Basic OSPF Convergence Benchmarks (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||||||
OSPF Benchmarking Terminology and Concepts (Informational) |
|||||||||||||
Benchmarking Basic OSPF Single Router Control Plane Convergence (Informational) |
|||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Brian Carpenter |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||
APP |
Domain Name System Media Types (Informational) - 1 of 2 |
||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Mary Barnes |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
GEN |
LDAP Schema for UDDIv3 (Informational) - 2 of 2 |
||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||
Review: |
Spencer Dawkins |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
3.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorReviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document |
|||||||||||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
||||||||||||