Gen ART Assignments

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2004-09-27).

Updated 01:53:53 am, 09/21/04

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area

Date

INT

Sep 20

Management Information Base for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Cable Modem Termination Systems for Subscriber Management (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4

draft-ietf-ipcdn-subscriber-mib-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Review

John Loughney

OPS

Sep 19

Management Information Base for DOCSIS Cable Modems and Cable Modem Termination Systems for Baseline Privacy Plus (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4

draft-ietf-ipcdn-bpiplus-mib-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Review

Mary Barnes

INT

Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 3 of 4

DNS Security Introduction and Requirements (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4

draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-intro-11.txt

Note: 2004-09-03: AD review uncovered only minor issues, will start IETF
LC. Note: the following documents will be processed together as a set:
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-intro-11.txt
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-protocol-07.txt
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-records-09.txt

Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-protocol-07.txt

Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-records-09.txt

Token:

Thomas Narten

Review

Spencer Dawkins

SEC

Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4

draft-ietf-pkix-certstore-http-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Michael Patton

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area

Date

OPS

Basic Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Back to clear Steve's DISCUSS and for review of other minor changes. html diffs are available from:
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/temp/ Participant in PROTO Team pilot:
Working Group Chair Followup of DISCUSS Comments
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-discuss-pilot-01.txt

Token:

David Kessens

Review

Joel Halpern

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area

Date

OPS

Sep 19

Policy Core Extension Lightweight Directory Access Protocol Schema (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-reyes-policy-core-ext-schema-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: IETF Last Call ends on 22 Sept. Sofar I have not seen any Last Call comments
so I am putting it on Spet 27 agenda.

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Review

John Loughney

RTG

Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Codepoints (BCP) - 2 of 2

draft-kompella-zinin-early-allocation-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bill Fenner

Review

John Loughney

2.2.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
APP		Tags for Identifying Languages (BCP) - 1 of 1
		draft-phillips-langtags-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Ted Hardie
	Review	Joel Halpern

3. Document Actions

					Area		Date
3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
			3.1.1 New Item NONE 3.1.2 Returning Item
					TSV		Nov 9	Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 1
								Security Threats for NSIS (Informational) - 1 of 1
								draft-ietf-nsis-threats-05.txt
								Next Steps in Signaling: Framework (Informational)
								draft-ietf-nsis-fw-06.txt
							Token:	Allison Mankin
							Review	Mary Barnes


3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
	3.2.1 New Item
		Area		Date
		GEN				Calendar Access Protocol (CAP) (Experimental) - 1 of 1
						draft-royer-calsch-cap-00.txt
						Note: This document is the successor to the draft-calsch-cap-13. As part of the closure of the CALSCH working group, the chairs, author, and I agreed that it should go forward as experimental to document the point the group reached.
				Token:		Ted Hardie
				Review		Joel Halpern

	3.2.2 Returning Item NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document represent an end run around the IETF's working groups or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.
			3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE

Gen ART Assignments

2. Protocol Actions

2.1 WG Submissions

2.2 Individual Submissions

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor