[R-C] Charter to be shipped

[Michael Welzl]

let's not forget that the original charter was made by harald, and i  
have only incorporated changes suggested on the list. it's really his  
+ your all achievement.


On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:07 PM, Bob Briscoe wrote:

> Michael,
>
> I'm also v happy with it.
>
>
> Bob
>
> At 18:40 15/08/2012, Matt Mathis wrote:
>> It looks really good!   Thanks for figuring out what I meant...
>>
>> I believe the charter accurately describes the largest solvable
>> problem with just the right edges.  Furthermore, it properly
>> identifies boundaries to adjacent problem spaces, with just the right
>> amount of fuzziness.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --MM--
>> The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Wesley Eddy <wes at mti-systems.com>  
>> wrote:
>> > On 8/15/2012 9:01 AM, Michael Welzl wrote:
>> >> Hi Wes,
>> >>
>> >> Here's our charter, in a version that is ready for IESG review.  
>> Note
>> >> that there was also some discussion about the name - other  
>> suggestions
>> >> were "IMCC - Interactive Media Congestion Control" and "IRCC -
>> >> Interactive RTP Congestion Control". I think that the discussion  
>> wasn't
>> >> intense enough to indicate that people really care a lot about  
>> the name,
>> >> though, and so I suggest to leave it as it is for now, just for  
>> simplicity.
>> >>
>> >> (someone told me that the IESG in fact decides the name, when  
>> the time
>> >> comes?)
>> >>
>> >> Is "shipping to the IESG" accomplished by sending you this  
>> email?  :-)
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ACK.  This looks good to me, and I'll have it on the next
>> > available IESG telechat to try and approve it for external
>> > review.
>> >
>> > Regarding the name ... we can note the other options that
>> > have been suggested during the IESG discussion, but I don't
>> > think we will select something that the community doing the
>> > work doesn't identify with.  I agree with you that at this
>> > point there doesn't seem to be a huge amount of push in any
>> > clear direction for a new name.  We know the keys that need
>> > to remain are RTP and congestion, and I think we agree pretty
>> > well on the scope of work, so IMHO playing with other words
>> > to sandwich around "RTP" and "congestion" isn't going to
>> > change much else.
>> >
>> > Thank you to everyone for the feedback and especially to
>> > Michael for wrangling it all together so actively!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wes Eddy
>> > MTI Systems
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Rtp-congestion mailing list
>> > Rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
>> > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rtp-congestion mailing list
>> Rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,                                BT Innovate & Design