[R-C] Slides for the ICCRG session

[Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)]

These algorithms are also sensitive to loss and/or ECN. The various AQM
algorithms on the middleboxes will send these signals, and the TCP
stacks will respond appropriately.

bvs


-----Original Message-----
From: rtp-congestion-bounces at alvestrand.no
[mailto:rtp-congestion-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Jim Gettys
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:58 AM
To: Harald Alvestrand
Cc: rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: [R-C] Slides for the ICCRG session

There is a problem with delay sensitive congestion control algorithms:
if you have an effective AQM in place, the delays vanish, and they cease
to be effective...  So the premise that such an algorithm (if it is only
sensitive to delay) will keep itself out of the way of other traffic
seems flawed to me....
           Jim


On Mar 23, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> My slides for the ICCRG session, all in one PDF - as of Friday night.
> Will send them to the ICCRG chairs by Sunday morning at the latest.
> 
> Comments welcome; those who wish to comment on the Google Docs
document can go to
> 
>
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/presentation/d/1OfBO_UyxdFaey8R_cwd
5Vo6OIZjSy1YwxwtZyMLcM84/edit
> 
> and request access.
> 
>                  Harald
> 
> <IETF83ICCRGRTPCongestion.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> Rtp-congestion mailing list
> Rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion
_______________________________________________
Rtp-congestion mailing list
Rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion