<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
+1. <br><br>One place where we could "spend our energy wiser" might be on enabling interoperability<br>of HTTP transported realtime media. Although peer-to-peer traffic is more desirable when<br>possible, "HTTP fallback" is in practice required a significant fraction of the time, due to the <br>prevalence of highly restrictive firewalls. <br><br>> From: stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com<br>> To: tom.taylo@huawei.com; harald@alvestrand.no; Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com<br>> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:17:51 +0100<br>> CC: rtc-web@alvestrand.no; dispatch@ietf.org<br>> Subject: Re: [RTW] [dispatch] Charter proposal: The activity hitherto known as "RTC-WEB at IETF"<br>> ><br>> >I agree that at least for the time being it is more fruitful to focus <br>> >the energy elsewhere. There is plenty of useful work that can be done <br>> >about media transport (the datagram service and the potential bytestream <br>> >) and the associated APIs, and I suggest we focus on that. We can try our <br>> >luck with the codec thing later on.<br>> <br>> I agree. Codec discussions seem to go on forever, and we could spend our<br>> energy wiser.<br>> <br>> Stefan<br>> <br>> PS Sorry for answering late, but I did not follow dispatch. I thought all <br>> related messages would go on rtc-web as well. So those of you who do not <br>> follow dispatch: perhaps you should look into the dispatch archive.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> RTC-Web mailing list<br>> RTC-Web@alvestrand.no<br>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web<br> </body>
</html>