[RTW] Workshop report, version one

[Harald Alvestrand]

On 10/19/10 00:49, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> In terms of items for further work, I believe we talked about a STUN 
> API in Javascript, as well as the need for integration between 
> STUN/ICE and Websockets.
>
> With respect to ICE, there was  some discussion about whether we were 
> talking about ICE, ICE-lite, or ICE with HTTP/HTTPS failover.   While 
> settling on the precise ICE functionality might not create an 
> interoperability problem between browser A and browser B if both were 
> connecting to the same service, if they were connecting to 
> different services there is the potential for clients ending up with 
> incompatible ICE Javascript libraries.
I think this is on the list of things that have to be worked out, I 
don't think the workshop went into enough details to give an answer here.

The ICE-lite of RFC 5245 appendix A seems to be "appropriate only for 
devices that will *always* be connected to the public Internet and have 
a public IP address at which it can receive packets from any 
correspondent" - this doesn't seem to be appropriate for a browser, so 
what's embedded in the browser is certainly not going to be ICE-lite.

What do you mean when you say "ICE with HTTP/HTTPS failover"?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: hta at google.com
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:12:58 +0200
> To: stefan.lk.hakansson at ericsson.com
> CC: rtc-web at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: [RTW] Workshop report, version one
>
> Good point! paragraph added.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 16:53, Stefan Håkansson LK 
> <stefan.lk.hakansson at ericsson.com 
> <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson at ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>     Harald,
>
>     thanks for the report. I find it accurate and well balanced, but I
>     miss one piece:
>
>     There was an agreement that codec (media format) negotiation
>     should be supported so that codecs supported by the device (maybe
>     being HW accelerated) can be used (if both endpoints support these
>     codecs).
>
>     Maybe it should go into the codec section (or "other pieces").
>
>     Stefan
>
>     ________________________________
>
>     From: rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no
>     <mailto:rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no>
>     [mailto:rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no
>     <mailto:rtc-web-bounces at alvestrand.no>] On Behalf Of Harald Alvestrand
>     Sent: den 18 oktober 2010 16:03
>     To: rtc-web at alvestrand.no <mailto:rtc-web at alvestrand.no>
>     Subject: [RTW] Workshop report, version one
>
>
>     Enclosed (in PDF) is the first version of the RTC-Web workshop report.
>
>     Comments to the list, please!
>
>                       Harald
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ RTC-Web mailing list 
> RTC-Web at alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTC-Web mailing list
> RTC-Web at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtc-web
>