OPEN ISSUE: Quality Process WG Charter

Spencer Dawkins spencer at mcsr-labs.org
Thu May 29 14:56:19 CEST 2003


Dear Harald,

Ouch!

My understanding was that we were thinking "request NOMCOM to provide
co-chairs
for the WG". I guess I assumed this would happen before Vienna.

Are you requesting volunteers (or, more likely, nominees) to chair a BoF in
Vienna?

Spencer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald at alvestrand.no>
To: "Margaret Wasserman" <mrw at windriver.com>;
<problem-statement at alvestrand.no>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: OPEN ISSUE: Quality Process WG Charter


>
>
> --On torsdag, mai 29, 2003 09:22:23 -0400 Margaret Wasserman
> <mrw at windriver.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > At 03:23 PM 5/29/2003 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> >> I think this WG would/should be focused on the WG process, and review
as
> >> one tool to improve that process.
> >
> > Sold.
> >
> > So, Harald, do you know if there is any effort underway to
> > actually _start_ this WG?  Any hope for a BOF in Vienna?
>
> as far as I know, the line of volunteers is completely empty.... but the
> deadline for scheduling BOFs in Vienna is not yet over (the scheduling
> officially closes on June 20).
>
>               Harald
>



More information about the Problem-statement mailing list