Statistics (RE: The "late surprise" problem)
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Sat Mar 22 08:46:06 CET 2003
as it happens, I have some numbers for the period between Atlanta and San
Francisco.....
> IETF Activity since last IETF Meeting (Atlanta)
>
>
> 428 New I-Ds (71 of which were updated, some (14) more than once)
> 754 I-Ds were updated (Some more than once)
> 44 I-Ds Last Called
> 75 I-Ds approved for publication
>
> In the final 4 weeks before meeting
>
> 238 New I-Ds were received 56% (of total newbies since last meeting
> 513 I-Ds were updated 68% (of total updated since last meeting)
>
> Week 1 90 12%
> Week 2 82 11% (Initial cutoff)
> Week 3 194 26% (ID Cutoff)
> Week 4 385 51%
--On 22. mars 2003 09:15 -0600 Basavaraj.Patil at nokia.com wrote:
> Another thing that would help in determining the size of the SIRs
> group is to obtain some stats on the number of WG LCs and IETF LCs
> issued in a year. That way the suggested size of 100 can be reviewed
> and scoped for sufficiency.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list