MIXER example (mailing list size/activity)
Eric Rosen
erosen at cisco.com
Fri Mar 14 10:01:03 CET 2003
> Ummm, I suppose zero-based chartering (IESG decides what WGs to
> KEEP after every meeting) is out of the question?
Revisiting every decision three times a year is not the way to ensure
progress or to improve quality. This is like Dilbert's boss saying "you're
way behind schedule, so now I'll be needing hourly status reports."
Note also that a recalcitrant IESG member can deliberately delay the
progress of a WG, and then claim that the progress is too slow.
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list