My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
Bound, Jim
Jim.Bound at hp.com
Tue Apr 22 14:10:35 CEST 2003
Dave,
I agree 100%. But being an expert and not attending meetings is not
good is all I should have said and been more clear.
But there is a difference between one who comes to meetings and is
engaged and clueful and those who are engaged and clueful who do not
come to meetings. Coming to meetings is a demonstration of commitment
and why we have this rule for nomcom process too.
/jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc at dcrocker.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 12:53 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: problem-statement at alvestrand.no
> Subject: Re: My thoughts about the problems of the IETF
>
>
> Jim,
>
>
> "attending" a couple of meetings is in no way a demonstration
> of someone being engaged, committed or clueful.
>
> d/
>
> BJ> I am seeing there is no way to continue without additional review
> BJ> efforts across the board for multiple problems. In your
> doc I would
> BJ> suggest that any reviewer must have attended at least 2 IETF
> BJ> meetings in the past 4 as we don't want people popping in who are
> BJ> not engaged and committed.
>
>
> --
> Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>
>
>
More information about the Problem-statement
mailing list