Registration of media type application/calendar+xml
Nathaniel Borenstein
nsb at guppylake.com
Sat Sep 11 14:42:13 CEST 2010
Although I agree, and will stipulate, that:
-- Multiple syntaxes are nearly always a bad idea
and
-- iCal is badly broken (in fact, more broken than any of the cited articles indicate)
We don't live in the best of all possible worlds. There is a demonstrable need to continue to support iCal, and to have an interoperable XML format, until something better comes along. While I would enthusiastically support and work on such a better calendar format (I will resist the urge to add my list of additional problems with iCal to the discussion), I think we have to cope with current reality, in which there is a growing demand for XML calendar interoperation.
In other words: iCal sucks but that's irrelevant. Multiple syntaxes suck, but sometimes they're necessary. We've created a great big turd, and now we need to periodically squirt perfume on it or it will only smell worse and worse over time. -- Nathaniel
On Sep 10, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2010, at 06:09, Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu> wrote:
>>
>> If you have a beef with the iCalendar data model, feel free to try to come up with a better one.
>
> Funny you should say that :-)
> http://fanf.livejournal.com/104586.html
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
More information about the Ietf-types
mailing list