Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-03

[Chris Lilley]

On Friday, September 25, 2009, 1:52:02 PM, Julian wrote:

JR> Chris Lilley wrote:
>> ...
>> which also brings advice on the use of the charset parameter into line with current practice. In brief, the charset parameter should only be added if it agrees with the xml encoding declaration. In the absence of an explicit charset parameter, the encoding specified by the xml encoding declaration is used. (This is a change from RFC 3023, which required enforcing us-ascii in that case).
>> ...

JR> Clarifying... this appears to apply only to application/xml, not 
JR> text/xml, right?

Hi Julian,

Right - text/* is much more constrained here in terms of what can be fixed. 

So text/xml has not changed but also, is deprecated for that reason. My comment (slightly loose as a summary, perhaps) was in the context of application/xml and the non-text/*+xml types. 



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris at w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG