MPEG asks for MIME review for the MPEG21 file format
Anne van Kesteren
annevk at opera.com
Mon May 21 10:48:49 CEST 2007
On Sun, 20 May 2007 02:24:11 +0200, Chris Lilley <chris at w3.org> wrote:
> Swapping your sentences around: yes, the whole idea of +xml is that you
> know you can use a generic XML parser.
>
> Something that might or might not be xml, therefore should not use +xml.
>
> An XML parser must understand UTF-8 and UTF-16 and may understand other
> encodings. I gather that the Efficient XML folks will declare a new
> encoding, and parsers which don't know it will not parse it. Same is if
> I said the encoding was
>
> encoding="i-bet-you-never-heard-of-this-one"
"Efficient XML" seems to be more on the content encoding level than the
character encoding level to me. (Assuming you meant charset="blah" as
opposed to encoding="blah" above given your examples of UTF-8 and
UTF-16...)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
More information about the Ietf-types
mailing list