Request for review of Media Type Registration of RTP Payload Formats

[Chris Lilley]

On Monday, May 1, 2006, 7:01:33 PM, Colin wrote:

CP> The AVT working group requests media types review of draft-ietf-avt- 
CP> rfc3555bis-04.txt and
CP> draft-ietf-avt-rfc3555bis-part2-00.txt. Both drafts are currently in  
CP> working group last call. We would be grateful if any comments could  
CP> be made by 15th May 2006.

Clarifying question- all of the formats listed below are only for use over RTP and do not make sense over non-streaming protocols?


CP>       audio/DVI4
CP>       audio/G722
CP>       audio/G723
CP>       audio/G726-16
CP>       audio/G726-24
CP>       audio/G726-32
CP>       audio/G726-40
CP>       audio/G728
CP>       audio/G729
CP>       audio/G729D
CP>       audio/G729E
CP>       audio/GSM
CP>       audio/GSM-EFR
CP>       audio/L8
CP>       audio/L16
CP>       audio/LPC
CP>       audio/PCMA
CP>       audio/PCMU
CP>       audio/VDVI
CP>       video/nv



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris at w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG