<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Hi.<br><br>Michael Everson everson at evertype.com<br>Fri Nov 22 11:59:43 CET 2013<br><br><br>> On 22 Nov 2013, at 01:59, Doug Ewell <doug_ at_ewellic.org> wrote:<br><br>> . . . <br><br>>> The only thing "all" would accomplish for >> these new variant records is to add unneeded >> redundancy.<br><br>> Oh, you don’t like the evident redundancy. > (By the way, there’s also Glag.)<br>Church Slavonic writen in [Glag] does not have variants, is not written to show distinct reflexes?<br>Somehow I take it these variants are never relevant to Church Slavonic, written in [Glag], and that this is a reason for specifying the script subtags to be used in the prefixes for these.<br><br>(Sorry to be confused.)<br><br>Best,<br><br>--C. E. Whitehead<br>cewcathar@hotmail.com <br>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/<br><br><br><br> </div></body>
</html>