<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<BR><BR><PRE>Doug, sorry, we discussed the request in August but I mistakenly thought the variant requests were on hold till the change went through--</PRE><PRE>but reviewing the files I see that such a hold was not necessary as we had prefix subtag and were just changing its name/description not the subtag itself!</PRE><PRE>Although these variant subtags are not yet available using Richard Ishida's search utility, I just found them all in Stephane's xml version of the registry (<A href="http://www.langtag.net/registries/language-subtag-registry.xml">http://www.langtag.net/registries/language-subtag-registry.xml</A>; but downloads too slowly--I wish they were in Richard Ishida's tool--seems we've had this discussion already though).</PRE><PRE>Best,</PRE><PRE> </PRE><PRE>C. E. Whitehead</PRE><PRE><A href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com">cewcathar@hotmail.com</A>
<EM>Doug Ewell doug at ewellic.org
Tue Nov 17 03:09:21 CET 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:
>> change request nuimber 2009-071
>>
>> http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_detail.asp?id=2009-071&lang=djk
>>
>> This is for the Nenge, Businenge Tongo.
>> I see no reason to oppose this change as the new name encompasses a
>> wider group of speakers perhaps (this may have implications for the
>> 2009-069 case above!)
>>
>> And of course, I am anxious to see this particular request approved so
>> we can process the variant requests.
> We processed the variant requests two months ago.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s ­
</EM></PRE> </body>
</html>