<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Hi.<BR>
<BR>
I agree we should not collapse Serbian, Croatian, and Bosnian (which is of course an issue separate from whether or not [sh] for the macrolanguage Serbo-Croatian should be 'revived'); of course, for [sh] to indicate a macrolanguage, there also have to be the separate individual languages [sh] encompasses; I assume thus that there is no chance of collapsing the individual languages without first changing the scope of [sh]??? Which "MUST mirror changes made by ISO 639" anyway? <BR>
<BR>(NOTE: Apparently there are some differences between the three languages which can be emphasized [of course there are differences between British and American English]. I saw a link to a perhaps interesting article at "Questia" on the differences between the Serbo Croation languages--but have no access to it.)<BR> <BR>Thanks.<BR> <BR>--C. E. Whitehead<BR><A href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com">cewcathar@hotmail.com</A><BR><BR><BR>Randy Presuhn <A title="Anomaly in upcoming registry" href="mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no?Subject=Anomaly in upcoming registry&In-Reply-To=">randy_presuhn at mindspring.com </A><BR>Thu Jul 9 07:03:14 CEST 2009 <BR><BR>> Where I *don't* want this discussion to go is down the path of<BR>> whether any of the languages formerly known as Serbo-Croatian<BR>> should be collapsed, as Romanian and Moldovan (rightly) were.<BR><BR>> Randy<BR><BR><BR></body>
</html>