<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
John, thanks for your reply on this; so all Germanic languages have codes now in RFC 4645? <BR>
<BR>
So [gme], [gmq], [gmw] are codes for indicating several languages? What happend to [gem], which I was told was to indicate languages without codes (for example, [sxu] did not have a code till this update)?<BR>
<BR>
I agree with John that the tree is not very good for the Germanic languages though I am not the expert on these [some pronunciations are shared between North Germanic, Dutch, and English, & I find the families as set up by the tree a bit confusing]; but we don't need the tree so much at ietf; just the codes--& if the families/codes are not correct then this is not dealt with here is it anyway?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
CE Whitehead <A title="Lower Saxon as a group" href="mailto:ietf-languages%40alvestrand.no?Subject=Lower%20Saxon%20as%20a%20group&In-Reply-To=">cewcathar at hotmail.com </A><BR>Sun Feb 22 23:28:30 CET 2009 <BR><BR>> Hi, John, Anthony, thanks for the info: my question is are these new Germanic codes ([gem], [gm], [gmq]) still<BR>Should be [gme], [gmw], [gmq]<BR>(either I typed too quickly or my email got butchered; sorry; I've tried twice to type these codes correctly; this is my third try)<BR>
<BR>
--C. E. Whitehead<BR>
<A href="mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com">cewcathar@hotmail.com</A><BR>
<BR>> used in the way [gem] is used, that is, to indicate languages not already assigned codes? <BR><BR> <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></body>
</html>