<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Michael Everson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:everson@evertype.com">everson@evertype.com</a>></span> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="Ih2E3d"><div>On 24 Sep 2008, at 07:26, Mark Davis wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Well, I'd rather have a badly named tag than no tag at all, so if Michael's version is the only one he'll approve, then I'd settle for it.</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Meh. It isn't "badly-named". But consensus is as consensus does.</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't see any particular consensus on the best subtag name -- if you wanted consensus you would take a straw poll.</div><div><br></div><div>Mark</div></div></div>