<div dir="ltr">While I share that opinion, there were others that objected to it. And I can live with the required prefix being only zh; I think that reasonable implementations will also include Latn anyway.<br><br clear="all">
Mark<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Peter Constable <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:petercon@microsoft.com">petercon@microsoft.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
From: <a href="mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no">ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no">ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no</a>] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> Here are the proposed new records and registration forms, for a two-week<br>
> review period. (Sorry, guys: RFC 4646, Section 3.7.) Eligible to be<br>
> added Wednesday, September 9 at 3:00 UTC, unless someone objects or<br>
> finds a problem.<br>
><br>
> ===<br>
><br>
> LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION<br>
</div>...<br>
<br>
> Prefix: zh<br>
<br>
IMO this should be "zh-Latn".<br>
<br>
More generally, it has always been my opinion that variant subtags denoting a particular written form should always be prefixed by a script subtag except when Suppress-Script applies.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
Peter<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Ietf-languages mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no">Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>