<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On 26 Aug 2008, at 09:43, Yury Tarasievich wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Michael Everson wrote:<br>...<br><blockquote type="cite">At present I am favouring YYYYacad as we have for French, if the <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">orthography can be pointed to a codified source.<br></blockquote><br>But such numbering would be somewhat bogus.<br>At the very least, 1959, 1985 and, now, also 2008 versions (to be <br>formally introduced in the 2010, but already used for some years in some <br>sources) are used quite interchangeably.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Interchangeably? What do you do about spell-checking?</div><div><br></div><div>In principle 1959acad, 1985acad, and 2008acad could be quite useful in such a context.<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -webkit-monospace; "></span></div><div><br></div><div>"Academy" by itself is too vague, and could apply to any country. </div><div><br></div><div>What is "Institute of Linguistics of Academy of Sciences of Belarus" in Belarusian?</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -webkit-monospace; "><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'Everson Mono'">Michael Everson * </font><a href="http://www.evertype.com/">http://www.evertype.com</a></span></div></div><div apple-content-edited="true"> </div><br></body></html>