This was the only issue that was found, so you still have a pretty good record.<br><br>Yes, this would wait until the bis.<br><br>Mark<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Doug Ewell <<a href="mailto:doug@ewellic.org">doug@ewellic.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Mark Davis <mark dot davis at icu dash project dot org> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I am forwarding a requested fix for TP/TL.<br>
><br>
>> The ending date for TP and the beginning date for TL in the IANA<br>
>> language subtag registry are wrong. ISO 3166-1 V/5<br>
>> (<a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/newsletter_v-5_east_timor.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.iso.org/iso/newsletter_v-5_east_timor.pdf</a>), effective<br>
>> 2002-05-20, indicates the code change. ISO 3166-1 V/6<br>
>> (<a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/newsletter_v-6_timor_leste.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.iso.org/iso/newsletter_v-6_timor_leste.pdf</a>), effective<br>
>> 2002-11-15, indicates a name change from "East Timor" to<br>
>> "Timor-Leste". Thus, TP's deprecation date should be 2002-05-20,<br>
>> which is the same date that the code is created.<br>
><br>
> The person double-checked all of them, this was the only region subtag<br>
> problem he found. I don't think the procedures allow this to be fixed<br>
> yet, however (forwarding to LTRU).<br>
<br>
</div></div>This is a bit embarrassing, actually, since I probably came up with that<br>
date and this is the sort of trivial detail I usually get right (perhaps<br>
at the expense of deeper issues).<br>
<br>
Having said that...<br>
<br>
Not only do the current rules not allow us to change a Deprecated date,<br>
I'm not sure it matters any more, since LTRU is talking about changing<br>
the rules to allow subtags to be un-deprecated, and has stated that<br>
reconstructing the state of the Registry as of a particular date is no<br>
longer a goal. It may be that the exact date of deprecation will become<br>
totally irrelevant, and only the status (deprecated or not) will matter.<br>
<br>
In any event, since the Registry did not exist until 2005, it can't make<br>
much difference on which date in 2002 a given subtag is declared to have<br>
been deprecated.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14<br>
<a href="http://www.ewellic.org" target="_blank">http://www.ewellic.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html" target="_blank">http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages</a> ˆ<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ltru mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ltru@ietf.org">Ltru@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru" target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mark